• NEW MEASURES OF PROGRESS

    • We create new metrics for use by federal, state and local agencies to advance genuine human progress in their jurisdictions.
    • We evaluate the benefits and costs of government policies, programs and projects on sustainable economic welfare.
  • FORESTS FOR CLIMATE AND BIODIVERSITY

    • We fight to end deforestation and forest degradation to restore nature’s carbon sink to its maximum potential.
    • We oppose logging and development projects that are harmful to climate and biodiversity.
  • CLIMATE JUSTICE

    • We oppose new fossil fuel infrastructure and work to expedite the transition to clean and renewable forms of energy.
    • We develop and advocate for Fossil Fuel Risk Bond programs as a means for internalizing the enormous social costs of carbon and dirty infrastructure. 
  • GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

    • We document the economic benefits of replacing grey with green infrastructure solutions.
    • We oppose federal, state, and local government decisions and expenditures that accelerate urban sprawl.

SERVICES

ANALYSIS

We specialize in public interest economics, carbon footprints, environmental impact analysis and in-depth reports for clients to help advance their priority initiatives.

SOLUTIONS

We develop robust and cost-effective policy solutions to the converging crises of our time and draft model legislative vehicles for elected officials at the federal, state and local levels.

ADVOCACY

We provide expert testimony in support of sustainability initiatives and challenge policies, programs and projects harmful to climate, biodiversity, and economic well-being.

LATEST

By John Talberth June 30, 2022
As previously reported, King County, Washington and Multnomah County, Oregon moved forward by passing resolutions initiating risk assessments to determine what level of financial risks taxpayers in those jurisdictions faced in the event of catastrophic, worst-case scenarios, such as a 9.0 earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone. EcoNorthwest completed that assessment for Multnomah County earlier this year, and found that taxpayers could potentially face up to $2.6 billion in economic damages unless owners of fossil fuel infrastructure in Portland’s Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub (CEI) adopted stringent mitigation measures against seismic risk. Spurred by that risk assessment, the Oregon Legislature, led by Senator Michael Dembrow (D-23) passed SB 1567 , a bill that requires all owners of bulk oils and liquid fuels terminals in Multnomah, Columbia and Lane Counties to conduct and submit seismic vulnerability assessments to the Department of Environmental Quality by June 1 st , 2024 and then directs the Environmental Quality Commission, in consultation with other agencies, to adopt a seismic risk mitigation program based on these assessments. Full implementation of SB 1567 has the potential to eliminate or significantly reduce taxpayer exposure for fossil fuel facilities in Oregon, and CSE will be engaging in the various assessment and rule making processes kicked off by the legislation over the next two years to help ensure this result. In King County, the fossil fuel risk assessment was completed in February of 2022 and focused on evaluating the adequacy of existing financial assurance mechanisms for reducing the financial risk from fossil fuel facility development in unincorporated King County. That report recommended that the King County Council adopt an ordinance to impose financial assurance requirements on any future thermal, LNG, or oil terminals to guard against public financial risks associated with vapor cloud explosions that may occur under a worst-case scenario. The report also found that there was sufficient evidence to warrant financial assurances for decommissioning. A proposed ordinance, as of this writing, is before the King County Council.
By Stable Planet Alliance March 12, 2022
MOUNT VERNON, Wash., MARCH 12, 2022 – The nonprofits Stable Planet Alliance and Scientists Warning Europe (SWE) announced publication today of a new paper and accompanying film: the “World Scientists’ Warning into Action” paper – a solutions-oriented follow-up to the 2019 “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency,” and the accompanying short film “Warnings to Action: Mobilizing Humanity.” CSE’s Dr. John Talberth helped lead the economics section of the paper, which calls on governments at every level to take bold actions to transform our economic system from one that drives climate change, extinction, and poverty to one that stays within a safe operating zone between planetary boundaries and social floors. The new paper, published today by the journal Science Progress goes beyond the reach of traditional scientific papers, and even existing scientists’ warnings. It lays out concrete actions for leaders to take on specific timelines to avert the most dangerous climate change and ecosystem loss, without which our current trajectory will rapidly destabilize civilization. The paper briefly recaps impending risks, but mainly articulates what leaders must do to avoid them, by when, and at what levels. It sets out a framework for solutions: specific, urgent, large-scale transformative actions and approaches to the multi-faceted planetary overshoot emergencies faced by humanity. Addressed to leaders around the world at multiple scales — from householders and community leaders to heads of state and the UN Secretary-General — the paper is a collaboration of 15 top world scientists, economists, and governance specialists from the USA, Canada, UK, Italy, Nigeria, South Africa, and Australia. “This paper shows the main ways that we can bend the needle on the climate and biodiversity crises, by systemic reforms at different levels,” said co-lead author, Professor Phoebe Barnard of the University of Washington, who is also CEO of the Stable Planet Alliance. “We had identified in 2019 in our World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency paper six issues for urgent action – Energy, Atmospheric Pollutants, Nature, Food Systems, Population Stabilization, and the Economy. In our new paper, we look at these issues at six scales of action: from individual and household levels through communities, cities, districts, nations and the United Nations. While most of our problems need systemic solutions, there are powerful opportunities for individuals and communities.” The paper has received wide airtime at COP26, and already prior to publication, has been co-signed by over 2,300 graduate specialists from 105 countries. It is accompanied by the new film “Warnings to Action: Mobilizing Humanity” by director Jonathan Clay, known for the 2021 Netflix film “Breaking Boundaries: The Science of our Planet” with Sir David Attenborough and Prof Johan Rockström. “This film and paper tell the leaders and officials at COP26, and people around the world, what is needed to save humanity and our planet,” says Managing Director of Scientists Warning Europe, UK lawyer and local politician Edmund Gemmell. “The paper offers concrete guidance for a wiser, sustainable civilization, and the film calls scientists, students, artists, faith leaders and others to step forward and work together to shape it.” “But we now have an extremely steep hill to climb,” says co-lead author, Professor Emeritus William Moomaw of Tufts University. “Since leaders have delayed essential action for decades, we have now dramatically reduced the comfort and timeframe within which we can make changes.” The paper also highlights just how ill-equipped are our existing systems of governance – and their vulnerability to corruption – to facilitate rapid and transformative change on short timescales. Time is now so short that we cannot wait for reforms to be complete before we act. Temporary measures must be enabled for planning, policy and management, including corruption prevention, while this is done. As the paper concludes, “Our challenges are less technical than social – taking the necessary actions quickly enough, in all nations and governance regimes – particularly democratic ones – while maintaining adequate social, economic and political stability to steer the ship of humanity safely into a wiser, more sustainable world order. This will require unprecedented global collaboration, social learning, and public awareness and pressure. This will profoundly challenge us all, and our systems of planning, cooperation and governance. (But) everything we know and love is at stake.” Read: World Scientists Warning – paper
By CSE staff February 3, 2022
Port Townsend, WA – On February 3rd, Center for Sustainable Economy (CSE) and Save The Olympic Peninsula (STOP) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court for Jefferson County against the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for failing to account for the harmful climate impacts of its logging proposals in violation of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The complaint names two Jefferson County timber sales – Goodman 1 and Taylor Downhill Sorts – that CSE and STOP challenged during the comment period and before the Board of Natural Resources (BNR). Taken together, the timber sales would log over 316 acres of state forests, remove nearly nine million board feet of wood and construct over a mile of new logging roads. BNR declined to make any changes in these sales to lessen their climate impacts and gave final approval for the sales during their January 4th and February 1st meetings. See below for the CSE-STOP complaint, opening brief, reply brief and administrative challenge files. Also find attached DNR's response brief, which contains their explanation of why they believe the DNR logging program has no climate impacts. In the context of each challenge, CSE and STOP provided extensive scientific information and data sources indicating that the two timber sales will generate significant quantities of greenhouse gas emissions, reduce the land’s ability to sequester carbon, and make the land more vulnerable to the effects of climate change by amplifying the risks associated with wildfires, floods, landslides, insects, disease, and heat waves. Remarkably, DNR’s generic response to these challenges is that climate change is not on the agency’s SEPA checklist and so warrants no attention whatsoever as timber sales are planned, sold, and logged: “At this time, the SEPA Environmental Checklist does not include analysis of climate impacts. The topic of climate impacts is an evolving issue as new science emerges and agencies work to include that new science in their work” ( DNR response to the Taylor Downhill project challenge ). According to Dr. John Talberth, President and Senior Economist for CSE, “The climate crisis demands that decision makers at DNR carefully consider the many ways these timber sales are generating greenhouse gas emissions and increasing the risks associated with fires, floods, and landslides, yet DNR has chosen to simply look the other way and deny it has any obligation to do so. We hope the court agrees with us that climate change presents an existential threat to humanity and must indeed be considered in the SEPA context for every project that poses a climate risk.” CSE and STOP are represented by the firm Bricklin & Newman, based in Seattle. According to the complaint, the groups are requesting six specific remedies, including (1) an order invalidating BNR’s approval of the Taylor Downhill and Goodman 1 projects for auction; (2) an order invalidating the ‘determination of non-significance’ for the projects as clearly erroneous; (3) a declaration that climate impacts are a necessary component of SEPA analysis for DNR logging proposals; (4) a declaration that the projects could have probable, significant adverse impacts to the environment; (5) an order enjoining all forest practices associated with the projects, (6) an order requiring mitigation for any climate-related impacts. If successful, the lawsuit will help CSE, STOP and others concerned with DNR’s logging program make the case for alternative timber sale designs that minimize climate impacts, including avoiding any additional logging of carbon rich legacy (naturally regenerated), mature and old growth forests, prohibiting new road construction, and using lower-impact techniques such as variable density thinning rather than clearcutting to help accelerate the development of fully functional forest conditions from timber plantations. These techniques will advance key biodiversity and climate goals, employ more workers, and put DNR in a position to take part in evolving carbon markets that can provide more income to the beneficiaries of its timber sale program (including schools) than what can be earned from timber alone. According to STOP Chair Ron Richards, “By evading its SEPA duties DNR is precluding these win-win-win solutions for the climate, for communities, and for workers. Instead, Commissioner Franz and DNR are building a wall of resistance that promises to keep business-as-usual clearcutting on the land for the foreseeable future.” Read: Appellants reply brief DNR response brief Appellants opening brief CSE and STOP vs. DNR – Complaint CSE and STOP rebuttal to the Taylor Downhill and Goodman 1 DNS DNR reply to the Taylor Downhill challenge

PROGRAM NEWS

REPORT

REPORT

JOURNAL ARTICLE

LITIGATION

PROGRAM NEWS

REPORT

REPORT

JOURNAL ARTICLE

LITIGATION

SOCIAL

Share by: